Welcome to Arcade-Freaks! Register today to play all the games and get MySpace game codes!

more news

Membership is growing!
March 27, 2007
Arcade Freaks is changing.
March 27, 2007
Pamela Anderson and Kid RockSplit
November 29, 2006
New Game!
November 21, 2006
Is Borat hot or what : "I Like you You like me?" Check these quotes out :)
November 18, 2006
3 New Games Added!
November 7, 2006
Click Here for BORAT VIDEO!
November 4, 2006
4 new ADDICTING GAMES HAVE been added!
October 24, 2006
Weekly Gossip, by your freak Damjan . . .
October 21, 2006
Your Friend Damjan is back with the Internet Gossip
October 9, 2006
More news!
September 30, 2006
Sup everyone.
September 24, 2006
Memantine –For Alzheimer Patients
August 7, 2006
Viagra for women. How!?
August 7, 2006
Auto Loan Options for People with Bad Credit
August 3, 2006
Auto insurance, Health Insurance, Homeowner insurance, purchasing, quoting and history att: Cardinal Boy
August 3, 2006
Conference calls and conference centers within a company Att:Contractor.
August 2, 2006
Bad Credit Mortgage
August 2, 2006
Back to School
August 2, 2006
Best consolidation loan for student
August 2, 2006
Adverse Credit Remortgage
August 1, 2006
Mesothelioma and symptoms
August 1, 2006
Laser Hair removal. (http://www.consumerlaserguide.com/)
July 31, 2006
Yahoo domain - Cheap comfortable easy reliable Yahoo Domains on the site - Everything about Yahoo Domains and what to do to register domain
July 31, 2006
Domain names, hosting, and ads?
July 31, 2006
VOTE FOR US!
July 30, 2006
More games added!!!!
July 28, 2006
I hooked up with a guy guy guy BABY bye bye bye! The latest news of the world!
July 27, 2006
WHAT DO YOUT THINK ABOUT THE NEW ROCKY BALBOA HUHHH!
July 20, 2006
The hottest new search words on the web
July 20, 2006
For all the webmasters out there!
June 30, 2006
Check this out..
June 15, 2006
Check out the latest Fifa World Cup 2006 results at www.arcade-freaks.com
June 10, 2006
World and local news!
June 8, 2006
Sorry for DOWNTIME!
June 6, 2006
Top articles by GATHER.com
June 4, 2006
Illegal downloading is NOT bull S*&t . . .
June 4, 2006
top 500 keywords since october 2005
June 4, 2006
best oldie party songs
June 4, 2006
Some sick stuff about Al Quaeda and Fu*&%ng Bin Laden
June 4, 2006
Our Member of the month!!
June 3, 2006
New Games!! And myspace games!
June 1, 2006
Top 20 google keywords
May 23, 2006
Top 15 google KEYWORDS
May 23, 2006
Lycos 50 Archives -- March 2006
May 19, 2006
Top 50 Lycos searches of the week
May 19, 2006
www.ET.com May 12, 2006 Oprah Honors 'Legends'
May 13, 2006
Latest news from www.wenn.com
May 11, 2006
200 most used search keywords.
May 9, 2006
The newest 50 most used search terms!
May 8, 2006
You might find this interesting!
May 8, 2006
Want to win something?
April 29, 2006

news

Movie Downloads and the Copy Protection Myth
August 3, 2006, posted by vibutx

Organizations that invest millions of dollars in movie content are very concerned about protecting their investments. That concern is perfectly reasonable. Technology companies have been happy to provide copy protection as part of their digital rights management (DRM) offerings, and movie owners hope to use these offerings to fight unauthorized use of digital content. Technical copy protection, however, will not stop piracy. The notion that copy protection can prevent digital theft is fatally flawed because it ignores two critical differences between the physical and digital worlds.

Digital World Difference #1: You Can Pick Locks By Using Software

In the physical world, a good lock can keep out most thieves. In other words, a physical lock that is 99% effective will stop 99% of break-ins and thus prevent 99% of potential losses due to theft. In the digital world, however, once a copy protection scheme is broken, someone can write a software program to make breaking the copy protection easy for anyone. After that, any thief that can download the software will be able to circumvent the copy protection and then steal digital content just as effectively and as fast as the original genius that broke the copy protection scheme.

Digital World Difference #2: Bits Can Be Copied

The second difference between the physical and digital worlds has to do with the concept of quantities. In the physical world, there is a one-to-one relationship between the quantity of an item that is stolen and the loss incurred by the rightful owner. In the digital world, however, a thief can make an unlimited number of duplicate copies from one stolen original. Unlike analog content (e.g. VHS tapes), which degrades every time it is duplicated, the 1s and 0s that make up digital content allow anyone to make perfect copies. So, for example, if one TV “falls off a truck” (a euphemism for theft), then the rightful owner incurs a loss of one TV set. But if one copy of a digital movie is obtained by the wrong person, it can result in millions of bootleg DVDs being sold in places like the markets of Shanghai or the subways of New York. That one stolen copy of a movie could also end up on a Bittorrent network where millions of people anywhere in the world can download it illegally for free.

Understandably, the fact that anyone can make unlimited perfect duplicates from one digital copy scares the daylights out of media executives. In an attempt to counter that aspect of digital content, many of these executives have hung their hopes on technical copy protection schemes. The problem with this approach is that it imposes a physical world concept on the digital world. In other words, instead of addressing the fact that a digital movie can be copied, it simply imagines that aspect of digital content away. Returning to the previous example, in the physical world, a lock that stops 99% of thieves will protect the owner from 99% of potential losses. In the digital world, a movie owner would need to stop 100% of piracy losses because if only one copy is lost, an unlimited number of duplicates can result.

When faced with the realities of the digital world, proponents of technical copy protection often argue that such technologies are still worthwhile because they are effective at deterring most unsophisticated would-be pirates. This concept, which some call the “speed bump” theory, ignores the fact that, because there is an Internet, unsophisticated pirates don't have to break a copy protection scheme; they can simply download a perfect duplicate made from the one original that escaped in-the-clear (i.e. unencrypted).

The speed bump theory also ignores the first difference between the physical and digital worlds (i.e. software makes everyone is an expert). Although it is both illegal and wrong, anyone capable of using a Web browser can download software that can circumvent copy protection. For example, it is trivial to copy retail DVDs since the standard copy protection used, which is called CSS (Content Scrambling System), was broken by a child in Norway in 1999, after which the first deCSS programs appeared. Since many versions of deCSS are freely available on the Internet, unsophisticated pirates do not need to know anything about encryption keys or the physical structure of a DVD in order to copy a disc that is encrypted with CSS. All they need to do is run software that was created by someone that did know.

In one very important sense, the digital world is exactly the same as the physical word. The simple axiom that “the customer is king” is no less true when it comes to selling movie downloads than when selling a physical object. Removing copy protection from digital downloads makes it possible for paying customers to more easily enjoy their purchases where they want to and when they want to. Without futile copy protection, on-line service providers would also be able to more quickly add features that create value for paying customers. The ability to burn personal use backup copies or export movies to a video iPod are just two examples of features that would be difficult or impossible for almost any DRM-based system to provide.

There is another movement afoot that is gaining traction even with some large players. A growing minority of organizations have adopted the philosophy that if you provide digital content to people in a usable form and at a reasonable price, then many consumers would rather pay for it than steal it. The success of companies like eMusic, a service that sells DRM-free music downloads, should serve as an example to executives in the movie industry. The Internet giant Yahoo! has also been making waves by following eMusic's lead and selling music downloads that are not copy protected. There is still time for the movie industry to learn from these examples. In order to succeed in a digital world, they should use the Internet to add value for paying customers, not take value away by using copy protection that inconveniences honest people while doing nothing to prevent large scale piracy.

About the Author
Jim Flynn is the CEO of EZTakes, Inc. (www.eztakes.com), a Web service that sells movie downloads that consumers can burn directly to DVD. EZTakes discourages piracy by personalizing DVDs with the identity of the purchasing consumer. By enabling consumers to burn DVDs that will play on virtually any DVD player, EZTakes has bridged the gap between the Internet and the living room.

Permalink